Are voiceless podcasts the way of the future?

 
 
 
 
 

If you’ve ever spent time on YouTube, you’ve probably come across “faceless” channels. 

Some even employ AI voices, allowing them to focus purely on content creation without involving their personal identities. This style of creation is becoming increasingly popular for video because it involves far less work. You don’t need a video camera, lighting or recording space. I can see the appeal to some creators.

It made me wonder: could podcasts follow a similar trend and become entirely voiceless? Let’s be clear here as to what “voiceless” means in this context. There is still technically a voice, but it’s not your human voice. 

With the increasing popularity of cloning voices using AI, are we on the precipice of stepping into a world where synthetic voices are the norm?

Imagine using AI to replace your voice altogether. No more recording sessions, just write a script, or you could go even further and have AI write your script for you. Then let an AI-generated voice say it all and bam, you’ve got yourself a “podcast”. 

To some, this might seem like a utopian shortcut—minimal effort for maximum output. To me, it initially felt very wrong and entirely impersonal. But, in the spirit of experimentation, I decided to give it a go and share my findings with you.

Steps in the Experiment

I used an AI voice cloning tool that is available inside of Descript. The process was fascinatingly swift and a bit eerie. Training the AI on my voice took about 20 seconds; then I challenged it further by having it generate a script on podcast launching. Let’s be clear: I would never typically outsource my scriptwriting to an AI. This was purely an experiment. 

The AI churned out a passable, albeit lifeless, script in about 20 seconds, and then I had it read the script in my AI-trained voice.

First Impressions

Listening to the AI version of "me" was surreal. The voice carried fragments of my character but was undoubtedly robotic. It lacked the emotion, cadence, and personal connection integral to podcasting. Spoiler alert: AI Brianna was boring. It was a stark reminder that the human element in podcasting is irreplaceable—for now, at least.

Potential Use Cases for AI in Podcasts

Despite the shortcomings, there are potential uses for AI voices. For instance, minor corrections—like fixing mispronounced names—could be efficiently addressed without setting up all the equipment again. While entire segments might still sound off, minimal edits might go unnoticed, saving time and effort. Yet, this is only feasible if creators have their AI voices pre-trained, which raises ethical and legal questions that I’d be interested in diving into further at some stage.

The Real Value in Human Connection

The crux of podcasting is creating a personal connection with listeners. As I recorded my thoughts, reflecting on the AI tool's output, it was evident that a monotonous, emotionless voice couldn’t forge the same bond. Most listeners seek authentic voices that convey real emotions, thoughts, and nuanced insights. AI, however advanced, presently fails to encapsulate that essence. The jokes don’t land, pauses are non-existent and I found myself unable to even digest the information that the AI voice was providing.

My little experiment with AI voices was illuminating, if not slightly unnerving. Although AI might handle statistical or factual content delivery, the soul of a podcast lies in its host's unique voice. This experience made me appreciate even more the art of podcasting and the irreplaceable value of human connection in our auditory world.

So, what do you think? Would you listen to an AI-generated podcast, or do you crave the genuine connection brought by a real voice? 

 

Transcript:

 
 
Previous
Previous

When to say no to a brand deal

Next
Next

Microphone Battle: Shure SM7B vs Shure MV7